While every court and every jurisdiction might have its own rules, which Sailfish Law will always research as its first priority and follow to the letter, AI usage in the practice of law is generally permitted and increasingly encouraged under professional competence standards. The American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility released its formal opinion covering the growing use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in the practice of law, pointing out that model rules related to competency, informed consent, confidentiality and fees principally apply.
Lawyers must provide "competent representation" to their clients. Amended Rule 1.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct states that "To maintain the requisite knowledge and skill, a lawyer should keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology". However, the rules vary significantly by jurisdiction and individual judges may have specific requirements.
In Illinois specifically, the Illinois Supreme Court has adopted an AI policy for the courts, which notes that attorneys are accountable for their final work product. They must thoroughly review AI-generated content before submitting it in any court proceeding to ensure accuracy and compliance with legal and ethical obligations. The Illinois Supreme Court encourages the responsible and supervised use of AI and recommends that Illinois state court judges not require lawyers to disclose the use of AI in drafting pleadings.
The fundamental principle across all jurisdictions is that AI must enhance, not replace, human legal judgment. Sailfish Law strictly adheres to this standard, ensuring all AI-generated work undergoes comprehensive attorney review and maintains full professional oversight.
Legal professionals must navigate several core ethical obligations when using AI:
Competence and Supervision: Lawyers must exercise the "legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation" and understand "the benefits and risks associated" with the technologies used to deliver legal services to clients. Every AI output must be thoroughly reviewed for accuracy and completeness.
Client Confidentiality: A lawyer using GAI must be cognizant of the duty to keep confidential all information relating to the representation of a client, regardless of its source. Sailfish Law uses only institutional-grade AI platforms with zero data training policies and ephemeral processing to protect client information.
Communication and Informed Consent: Model Rule 1.4(a)(2) states that a lawyer shall "reasonably consult" with the client about the means by which the client's objectives are to be accomplished. Many jurisdictions require or recommend informing clients about AI usage in their representation.
Reasonable Fees: If a lawyer uses a GAI tool to draft work product and expends 15 minutes to input the relevant information into the program, the lawyer may charge for that time as well as for the time necessary to review the resulting draft for accuracy and completeness. Sailfish Law passes AI efficiency savings directly to clients through reduced billable hours.
Sailfish Law maintains comprehensive policies ensuring compliance with all applicable ethical standards while maximizing the benefits of AI integration for clients.
The reality is that most law firms are already using AI technology in some capacity, whether they acknowledge it or not. The question isn't whether firms use AI—it's whether they use it effectively and transparently.
Universal Legal Research AI: Every attorney conducting legal research through Westlaw or Lexis is already using sophisticated AI systems. LexisNexis launched Lexis Protégé to general availability in February 2025, taking the place of Lexis AI Assistant, which can draft full, tailored transactional documents, as well as litigation motions, briefs and complaints. Westlaw's CoCounsel includes access to several different tools for summarizing law review articles and cases, drafting documents, and providing Microsoft Word plugins to assist with finding, drafting, reviewing, and summarizing existing documents.
Consumer AI Usage: Beyond professional platforms, lawyers routinely use consumer AI tools including ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, Gemini, and numerous other applications for research, writing assistance, document analysis, and strategic thinking.
The Reality Check: When firms claim they "don't use AI at all," they're either:
1. Unaware of the AI already integrated into their research platforms and office software
2. Using it ineffectively without strategic implementation or proper training
3. Being disingenuous about their actual technology usage
The reality is that there are currently a plethora of legal AI tools being marketed to legal professionals, and law firms will increasingly adopt sophisticated generative AI tools to streamline drafting, contract analysis, and predicting litigation outcomes, boosting both efficiency and access to legal services.
The Sailfish Difference: While other firms may use AI tools ad hoc or without strategic integration, Sailfish Law has built its entire practice model around optimized AI implementation. Rather than just using AI—the practice has mastered it to deliver superior client outcomes at transformative efficiency.
Absolutely. Human legal judgment remains central to everything done at Sailfish Law. It is up to the lawyer to analyze the accuracy and applicability of responses received from an LLM. LLMs are trained on large amounts of test data. A response to a prompt may not be as up to date as needed and it may not be as relevant as required in a given context.
Human-AI Partnership Model:
Client data protection represents Sailfish Law's highest priority. The institutional-grade AI platform maintains industry-leading security protocols:
Zero Training Policy: AI systems never use client data to train models, ensuring complete confidentiality and preventing any information from becoming part of broader AI datasets.
Ephemeral Processing: All client data is processed temporarily and immediately deleted after use, with no storage, logging, or permanent retention of sensitive information.
Advanced Encryption: Military-grade encryption protects all data both at rest and in transit using advanced cryptographic protocols that meet the highest industry standards.
Regulatory Compliance: The AI platform maintains full compliance with comprehensive data protection frameworks and undergoes regular security assessments to ensure institutional-level protection.
Professional Standards Integration: All AI usage adheres to the legal profession's highest ethical and confidentiality standards, exceeding typical technology security requirements.
This institutional-grade security infrastructure allows for leveraging powerful AI capabilities while maintaining the absolute confidentiality that attorney-client relationships demand.
Sailfish Law is prepared for any disclosure requirements and maintains complete transparency with clients and the courts. While the Illinois Supreme Court encourages the responsible and supervised use of AI and recommends that Illinois state court judges not require lawyers to disclose the use of AI in drafting pleadings, judicial attitudes vary across jurisdictions.
Sailfish Law's Approach:
Professional oversight and verification protocols are built into every aspect of the AI-enhanced workflow. While AI hallucination rates can be concerning when using general-purpose tools, Sailfish Law's approach significantly reduces this risk through strategic document-based AI implementation.
Unlike general AI queries that rely solely on training data, Sailfish Law's AI analysis is grounded in the actual documents and materials relevant to your case. When analyzing discovery productions, the AI works directly with the specific documents produced by the parties. When researching legal precedents, the AI is provided with the actual cases that apply to your matter. This document-grounded approach dramatically reduces the likelihood of AI hallucinations because the system is analyzing real, case-specific materials rather than generating responses from general training data.
Multi-Layer Verification Process:
Yes, significantly. AI integration delivers measurable cost reductions across all phases of legal representation, particularly in the discovery process that typically represents more than half of all litigation expenses.
Documented Savings Areas:
Client Benefits: Sailfish Law passes these efficiency gains directly to clients through reduced billable hours, making sophisticated legal representation accessible at rates significantly below traditional BigLaw fees.
Transparent Billing: Charges are based only on actual attorney time spent, including AI-assisted work, ensuring clients pay for results rather than inefficient processes.
Sailfish Law's commitment to technology leadership means continuous adaptation to advancing AI capabilities while maintaining the highest professional standards.
Continuous Evolution: The legal profession is truly on the cusp of a revolution led by the adoption of AI. The vast majority of legal professionals expect AI to significantly transform their work in the coming years. Sailfish Law doesn't just keep pace with these changes—it leads them.
Future-Focused Infrastructure: The institutional-grade AI platform receives regular updates and improvements, ensuring operation with cutting-edge capabilities while maintaining security and reliability.
Professional Development: Ongoing education on AI developments, legal technology trends, and emerging best practices is maintained to ensure effective integration of new capabilities.
Client Protection: Regardless of how AI technology evolves, the fundamental commitment remains constant: delivering superior legal representation through the strategic application of the most advanced tools available while maintaining the highest ethical and professional standards.